Time and again spirited negotiations take place on internet fora pertaining to a study of the status of a number of jyotish parameters( such as chara dasha (a signal based cortical period astrofactor) along with karakamsha (the navamsha in which the atmakaraka (most complex planet in longitude) is set. As characteristically happens, some of the discussants began to branch to other negative discussions which really had nothing to do with the original questions or themes along with some actually became a bit resolved and emotional, as additionally frequently happens on the internet where attention spans of days and weeks have been demanded in order to get to the bottom of matters and where sometimes a topic has been discussed on several unique boards and several issues simultaneously on a given board! As too is typical, nothing has been really resolved, and some of the regulars began expressing their frustrations about those topics coming up again and again and directing visitors to archives etc.. Alas, the ya-hoo forums/fora are those that only limited hunting of previous messages is possible without losing all of one's hair, and also the writings sometimes are kept onto yet another yahoo site which means that this does not help things when all one wants is to get a quick overview of what others are using and when possible their reasons for embracing a certain position! This latter usually brings about more gall than good information though the intention of the person posing the question may have been very commendable and not at all confrontational. Knowing Jyotish doesn't protect one from harbouring Neurotic traits!
Somewhere, across the path of this former quest, yet another topic got born and began questioning the use of varga kundalis or varga chakras, divisional horoscopes which are the heart of jyotish and have also been used by tropical astrologers at the form of harmonic graphs. This really is some thing which is found in Jyotish going straight back to almost the initial memories of even the earliest members in the discussion who finally admitted to this type of situation. I myself, even though myself maybe not that senior, have experienced horoscopes that were attracted in the century before last where the jyotishi had drawn the rashi chakra and navamsha and dashamsha and therefore on and much more importantly had commented on these graphs in his reading. kalyan matka panel chart Therefore, at the least some individuals had been utilizing varga-charts a handful of 100 years ago and possibly even just before those times.
Somewhere through the conversation, in another of these lists, one of the associates left available a post in that the writer had voiced thoughts to the contrary, i.e., vargas must not be utilised in a chart format. A discussion ensued which side stepped the important and applicable matter of these practical virtues of using of navamsha varga being a secondary chart. A few individuals asked for proofs in classics which indicates that ancient jyotishis urged of varga chakras. The discussants emphasized that ONLY rashi chakra has to be properly used and varga placements should just be useful for ascertaining the strengths of planets .
One of those members brought to each of astrologers' attention that Parashara had clarified very plainly just how exactly to find out bhavas from the rashi chart (ascendant, 10th house and trisection of the arcs, etc. in Chapter V of BPHS). This was indeed true and also a positive step ahead of the discussion. There were also parallel discussions going on which were rehashing the point that BPHS wasn't original and was perhaps not even a timeless and published by one or even a group of'latter day saints' [my word, not the first poster!] In Jyotish and for that reason cannot be treated as being a classic. Apparently, there was some support for this as could be similarly expected if some one should happen to make a comment that Jyotish was nothing but a derivative of Babylonian astrology that the army that came with Alexander brought to India. An issue that has been proven to bring even untoward jyotishis out on the"war-path!"
To those who have been interested and intrigued by thisparticular, there appeared to be just two streams of thought prevailing:
(a) Only Rashi horoscopes ought to be properly used. Additional varga kundalis were the product of tainted understanding of the classics - which themselves many concur might not have endured in pure form [although some of these have mercifully lived in fairly great shape1]. Underlying that is the belief some can harbor that, equally the breeze, available Jyotish is just 1/10th of their entire body as the submerged 9/10th is largely lost and partially hidden in the secret chambers of paramparas plus some of the secret records that exist nevertheless jealously safeguarded by the custodian families. I don't know just how a lot of this iceberg postulate is established data and how much is wishful fiction. According to the purists of the flow of thought, vargas MUST simply be utilized as measures of quantitative and qualitative strength of planets and also for the consideration of these deities and primal forces people represent however, maybe not at the kind of a horoscope and certainly no critical consideration has to be directed at aspects along with bhava considerations. Only for clarity, they'd maintain, for instance, that as the next house lord at navamsha is an important index, the simple fact that it is placed in the 2 nd navamsha varga from the navamsha lagna (essentially in 2 nd dwelling in navamsha chart) isn't important.
(b) Irrespective of if specifically described or perhaps not, the other stream of thinking maintains that varga kundalis have a significant role to play at Jyotish and potentially are of significant usefulness in differentiating primary mandates matters pertaining to the prescription given by sages. To put it differently, navamsha chart, by way of example, would hold significant sway on topics of spouse and marriage, while saptamsha graph would be of import at the examination of children in a particular nativity's reading. All these Vargas should be analyzed in a graph format.
In actuality, the majority of these utilized concepts from (a) and (b) streams. There seemed to be some different individuals who totally denied that the veracity of thought stream (b) and also a few were a little taciturn about it, perhaps to prevent acrimony and getting ensnared from the controversy. Or there were other good reasons, known only for them.